How can torrent beds be stabilized by dams?
1. Stabilization of torrent beds
Stabilizing torrent beds is the most common function of torrential correction dams. It aims to prevent longitudinal and/or lateral erosions. The spontaneous or artificial recovery of vegetation is a direct effect of the stabilization of the bed by dams. The coupling mechanism between bed stabilization and bank vegetation recovery could be summarized as follows: incisions in stream beds (Figure 1a) regularly lead to bank slippages (Figure 1b), preventing the vegetation from becoming permanently fixed. After the dams have landed, the marked incisions can no longer take place, stabilizing the bank feet and reducing their slope; these more stable slopes are then more suitable for vegetation installation (Figure 1c).
2. Slope consolidation
Landslides are major sources of sediment in torrents. The activation of these slope instabilities is significantly controlled by the state of their foot stops, i.e. by the erosion of the valley bottom. The specific mission of slope consolidation dams is to combat and reverse this trend: significantly raising the bed level (Figures 2c and d) through a dam or series of dams aims to consolidate the foot of the slope and slow down the activity of the stream.
Bed stabilization has an equivalent effect on the banks (Figures 2a and b), but it maintains the corrected level substantially at the mean level of the bed (this level is not constant but naturally varies by deposit-erosion cycles, called “torrential breathing”).
3. Slope reduction
The bed of most torrents is partially made up of or paved with large blocks from the slopes and little mobilized by the flows (light grey blocks in the figure). Its slope is then steeper than the alluvial equilibrium slope which would be representative of the actual grain size transported (dark grey pebbles in the figure). Torrential correction dams are usually built with a level set above the initial bed for practical reasons of construction and for a local effect of bank consolidation, so the formation of an alluvial upstream section generally follows, leading to a reduction in the slope. The equilibrium slope becomes less than the initial slope. This phenomenon is relevant to torrential correction since lower slopes generate less energetic flows, thus reducing many problems related to torrential floods (transport volume and grain size, erosions, etc.).
4. Sediment retention
The filling of the sections located upstream of the dams permanently traps the transported sediments. This sediment retention is present but generally secondary on all structures (the stored volume is very small compared to the volume transported by the stream over the life of the structure). However, there are a few structures, called retention dams, built specifically to trap a maximum volume of sediment in their landing area.
Once the structure was fully landed, new dams could eventually be built near the main structure to extend the filling of the upper valley. The development of earth-moving machinery has made it possible to clean the structures after each flood, making the implementation of new large retention structures quite rare.
5. Regulation of solid transport
Torrent beds show natural fluctuations in grain size, slope, cross section and bed levels, i.e. sediment storage. These are the famous “torrential breaths”. They are natural in the sediment cascade and can be influenced by hydrology, sediment (de)connectivity, grain size and the intrinsic fluctuations of the solid transport process. They are manifested by episodes of erosion and deposits in the bed. The creation of fixed points in the long profile prevents the propagation of regressive erosions and depavages (Figure 5).
The sections located between dams thus become semi-independent compartments (they always receive upstream flows but changes in bed level no longer influence the upstream compartment).
These independent compartments store sediments during periods of high transport and then release materials, creating temporary storage areas between structures (Figure 6), thus regulating episodes of high transport. This trend has led some practitioners to consider that dams are particularly useful for torrential correction because they deliver “retail”, what the torrent delivered too brutally “in bulk”.